RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Ground Fighting’ Category

Defense Against Shoots

04 Sep

Wing Chun vs. The Shoot

Today’s martial environment includes a host of takedowns and ground fighting applications. Due to mixed martial arts, we have all seen an explosion of jiu-jitsu and MMA schools around the world. I am a big fan of MMA because this approach attempts to bring realism back into the world of mainstream martial arts vs. blindingly training something because their teacher says it will work as trained. Like Wing Chun, their thought is that it needs to be trained and tested in today’s environment to really see how it will fare, and I am all for that. While I might not follow their methods of the art they work, I certainly follow their vision of keeping things as real as possible.

One of the more common applications that most will see in this type of fighting is the shoot. Regardless of the tactic that got them there, a shoot is when an attacker drives in low in order to take the opponent down. This can include single leg, double leg, a follow up sweep to collapse the defender’s body around himself, and basically any other combination that puts him on the ground.

The Wing Chun response to a shoot depends on how it is enacted, but one thing most of the defenses share is that we do not counter-grapple with a grappler. I would never box a western boxer because I am not a western boxer. I would never kick with a kicker, and I would never grapple with a grappler. Doing so would mean fighting their fight and adhering to the tactics they are used to vs. fighting my fight and sticking with how I work my own tactics.

Do not make the mistake of thinking that a shooter will telegraph what he is doing. A good shooter will be on you like there is no tomorrow, and the next thing you know you are on your back being choked out.

Also, if a shooter drives in and you successfully defend, do not think he will automatically withdraw in order to try again. In many cases, he will immediately change to another attack and work a new angle, striving to take advantage of every inch of ground they can gain and work whatever limb is presented.

So let’s take a common double-leg shoot and examine a couple of responses to see how a Wing Chun fighter might respond. Note the keyword of might here because there are a number of ways to respond to any given situation. I will simply describe one of the more common methods I have seen from my own experiences.

In this scenario, the attack sees a fake or even multiple punches to the top zone in order to draw your arms forward for the defense. This creates a hole to which the attacker drives low and into your legs. Grasping fully around your legs, a number of takedowns can occur ranging from trips and lifts to throws. This scenario will see one leg wrap around yours to trip you backwards while the attacker maintains a firm grasp to follow you down for a choke or lock.

The first action is the upper zone. Wing Chun’s concept of fighting dictates that when anything comes in, we respond to it. If it suddenly changes direction, Chi-sau has taught us to instantly respond even if we do not get the chance to make contact for feeling where the attack has changed to. Because of this, we need to work our Chi-sau in the gym so that even without feeling, we drive through the open holes.

Where a fake or feint is present, there is no opponent there to hit. Therefore, the direction immediately changes to a low trajectory. Biu-Tze’s third section includes Dim-jarn, or Vertical-elbow, which is quite adept at changing the arm from an out-stretched punch to an immediate elbow attack driving straight down into the back of the opponent’s head or into his neck/spinal column. The force of Dim-jarn is such that your entire body drives down with it vs. merely an arm action itself. Because of this, you can see the permanent injuries that can result to an attacker when they expose the back of their head.

There are two schools of thought as to what the low body should be doing when a shoot comes in. One is to sprawl backwards so that the attacker cannot grab the legs. The second is to take the opposite approach in that rather than backwards, we explode forwards. Moving forward, we drive a knee into the attacker’s face.

Depending on the attack, this may or may not work. It has a better chance of success if the attack is thigh level, but it will almost always fail if the attack is shin level (meaning that the attacker himself is lower and out of the way). You will never know which attack is appropriate until the attack actually happens, so those that train only to drive their knee forward will find themselves in a sticky situation if the shoot is performed by a trained fighter who knows to go very low (which improves his odds of taking you down).

Personally, I feel safer driving into my opponent and working tight, explosive elbows and knees. If the opponent goes extremely low, I will slam my palm down to his head and drive his head into my knee. This has the effect of doubling the power with half the effort.

However, if the attack is really explosive and powerful, chances are that he will drive right over you like a bulldozer. In this case, you need to work explosive Hau-bo or Wang-bo actions so that you are either further away or stepping to the side. This is not as easy as it sounds, though, because both of these actions will still leave a leg exposed to which the attacker can grab. While I feel more comfortable at driving into an attacker and working knees and elbows, the sheer physics of someone blasting into your legs will immediately put the odds in their favor; therefore, you need to work both of these drills with a trained shooter in order to learn the mechanics of how your body will respond.

 

 

Ground Fighting: Is It Really As Important As Some Say It Is?

24 Sep

Standup vs. Ground

Most martial arts focus on a primary point in which the rest of their system revolves around. For example, taekwondo is known for powerful kicks, jiu-jitsu for its grappling, locks, and ground fighting, boxing for lightning-fast jabs, crosses, uppercuts, footwork, etc.

While the Wing Chun system encompasses multiple ranges and tactics, its preferred focus is to remain standing and in punching range. Over 75% of all Wing Chun actions are driven by fist actions, so we can deduce that the art itself favors the punching range as having more opportunities for attack and defense.

But what about ground fighting? Is it really as necessary as some say it is? If so, when did ground fighting suddenly become so important? If not, why do so many arts have a ground fighting curriculum?

To answer this question, we should first examine what real life is all about vs. what is sometimes the mainstay in classroom teaching.

No one can say with certainty that all fights will go to the ground. I have had over 20 fights since opening the AWCA and not one has ever gone to the ground. Some have tried take downs, but Wing Chun’s anti-ground fighting and anti-grappling tactics prevented it.

But just as no one can say with certainty that all fights will go to the ground, we also cannot say that they will not go to the ground. All fighters have a preferred range but that does not mean that that range will be successful.

The truth of the matter is that you will never know what will happen until it does happen. And with the ever-changing world within the martial arts circles, our art must be constantly examined to ensure that it can respond to elements as they arise.

That being said, the curriculum I was taught does have a full ground fighting program. With grappling, anti-grappling, ground fighting, and anti-ground fighting tactics, the program begins at Student Grade 2 (section 2 of the Siu-Nim-Tau) and culminates at Student Grade 8 (after completing the Chum-Kiu and first 2 sections of the Chi-gerk curriculum).

These programs are nothing new to the Wing Chun environment, though. The concepts themselves are completely Wing Chun in every way, just applied from the ground. There are no jiu-jitsu, karate, or judo movements as some might claim, and nothing is “stolen” from any art that was not already there to begin with.

The concept of Wing Chun ground fighting focuses not on being tied up, but instead how to get back on our feet as quickly as possible. Wing Chun does not include all of the locks and pinning actions that arts such as judo or jiu-jitsu employ, so we do not train in that manner.

If we find ourselves on the ground, we will work to keep both hands in Man-sau so as to protect the upper body. Our legs will see one foot on the ground while the other is up for defense or attack. The feet can change positions as needed in order to drive into the attacker’s shin or knees, as well as switch positions for pivoting the body on the back in order to keep Man-sau pointed towards the attacker.

As the attacker comes in, we would drive a leg into their leg and, via Chi-sau, engage the upper body so as to explosively roll back over, putting us on top. From this point, elbows and punches would rain down on the attacker, or we could even step out of the position and resume standing in order to get back to our preferred range. After all, I would not want to grapple with a grappler. That is his range, not mine, and I want to fight my fight vs. his fight.

Is grappling and ground fighting as necessary as some claim it to be? Yes, it is. It is a valid range that we might find ourselves in, even if unintentional or by accident. And if you are in this range, the same concepts that serve us when standing are suited equally well when on the ground.