RSS
 

Archive for June, 2009

Follow Through As It Retreats

18 Jun

Following “Stay with what comes“, the second part of Wing Chun’s primary motto is “Follow through as it retreats“. Though somewhat elusive at first, these five words can open up a lot of doors for skillfully dealing with a host of situations.

During most encounters, there is a bit of hit-and-run tactics from the opponent. Attack, defend, attack, defend, etc. And it is the more common of methods seen, particularly with boxers, kickboxers, and those that seek out the weakest part of your defense.

“Follow through as it retreats” means that as the opponent withdraws (retreats), we follow through (or go after him). Since our primary tactic is to immediately go on the offensive and remain on the offensive (keeping the attacker on the defensive), it would also make sense to do this even when the attacker is retreating.

One of the most difficult tasks our attacker can face is meeting his/her attack with our own attack. While many will expect a defense, we instead go on the offensive in order to thwart the original attack and upset the timing.

In plain English, we use attack as defense, even when the opponent is withdrawing.

By combining “Stay with what comes” to “Follow through as it retreats”, we capitalize on two essential – but sometimes very misunderstood – elements of fighting by not allowing the opponent to fight his fight. Instead, we force him to fight our fight by always “staying in his face” with a flurry of attacks, even when he is retreating.

Next time, we will look at the last part of the motto, which is “Spring forward as our hand as freed”. It is that tactic that brings all of them into cohesion for a responsive and overwhelming response to any attack we might encounter.

email2friend
 

Stay With What Comes

11 Jun

One of the first mottos we learn in Wing Chun is:

Stay with what comes, follow through as it retreats, spring forward as our hand is freed

But what do these elements mean? “How” do we stay with what comes? “Why” do we follow through as it retreats? What is “it”, anyways?

Let’s go through the first one and take a look

Stay With What Comes
When you are attacked, instinct will command your body to do one of three things:

  1. Fight
  2. Flight
  3. Freeze

Many will state the “Fight or Flight” theory and say that only one of two things will happen, but we have seen that “Freeze” is also a response for quite a few. Fear can grip a person so strongly or suddenly that their instinct does not really know “what” to do, and with no route to follow, they can become immobilized.

But for a moment, let’s presume that we “are” in command of our faculties and have the skill set necessary to make a rational fighting decision, e.g. we “can” fight skillfully and it is up to a tactical decision how best to respond to an incoming opponent.

With “hit-and-run” tactics of many martial arts, the goal is to attack then defend, attack then defend, in adfinitum. This approach repeats itself until the opponent wears down or encounters a blow so powerful that “defend” is no longer a possibility. At that time, the attacker continues to attack in order to overwhelm and defeat the opponent.

The “hit-and-run” approach, while successful for some, can also be a severely trying tactic. For example, if you were successful with the first attack, the tactic now sees you withdrawing and then repeating another attack (for example, a boxer’s jab/cross combination, followed by stepping out then driving back in). With an action such as this, the attacker may have been successful with the first few punches, but now he has removed himself from continuing the attack.

In other words, the attack was halted on purpose in order to withdraw, and must now be repeated over and over until the opponent is defeated.

“Stay with what comes” follows the principle that rather than immediately responding to an attack by withdrawing or retreating, we stay with it. We take the fight “to” the opponent and force the situation to reverse itself by launching a flurry or barrage of counter-strikes in order to use offense as the defense.

When you withdraw, you basically allow the opponent room to maneuver or to take advantage of the distance in order to continue the original attack. Withdrawing or retreating can actually make the situation worse.

But if we stay with what comes, we utilize basic Wing Chun principles to remain offensive, which in turn keeps the opponent defensive. As long as our attacker is defensive, our odds greatly improve for protecting ourselves and ending the fight quicker, which in turn is much safer than a long drawn-out encounter.

email2friend
 

Standing Your Ground, Part 2

07 Jun

It has been a few days now since Part 1 was posted, and there have been some good thoughts addressed in your comments. I agree with all of them in one respect or another, so let me offer my take on things.

“Standing your ground” means having the structure and skills to drive directly into the opponent and handle what comes your way while remaining protective and safe. Since we always want to be on the offensive (which forces the opponent to be defensive), we stay on the attack in order to end the fight as quickly as possible.

One of the key elements of this, however, is also knowing when we should give way and take a different approach.

If you understand the basic structure of Wing Chun, then “standing your ground” makes a lot of sense. The problem is when we begin relying on our own force, our own physical strength, in order to make things happen. That is a grave trap for many, since it is not uncommon to meet up with someone that is just plain stronger than we are.

For example, if your attacker has roughly the same skill set as you do but is also stronger, then standing your ground will greatly decrease your odds of success. It becomes a force-vs-force situation, and in those types of situations, the stronger of the two forces has a better chance of winning.

In this example, we would then side-step in order to attack the least defended areas of the opponent.

So now the issue of “standing your ground” has taken on a tactical nature as well as a physical nature.

See? Isn’t this fun?

From my own experiences, I prefer to work the basic concepts of driving or wedging directly into the opponent and forcing him to deal with that rather than side-stepping without a real reason. In that, however, I also remain as pliable as possible so that if my own force is being overcome, I can change angles via side-stepping and go for the least protected areas.

There is a fine line between knowing how much strength you are encountering and when to give ground, and understanding that fine line is learned in Chi-sau training. While the basic tenets of Wing Chun’s tactical nature are easily learned, the route to put it into action is only accessible via Chi-sau.

Some might disagree with me, but I also do not see any harm in using your own strength to sway the course. If you have a powerful build and can engage an opponent with pure physical power, then this is a positive attribute. The real key to that, however, is still knowing when too much is too much, and when that occurs, Chi-sau will tell you this. Relying on your strength is wrong, but using your strength is not.

In the end, “standing your ground” means having a solid structure, as well as the tactical nature of taking the fight to the opponent. Simultaneously, it also means being relaxed and pliable enough to feel what is going on and to give way to a superior force (which is what we term as “borrowing” the attacker’s force).

The trick now is learning where those fine lines exist and to capitalize on them.

email2friend